Even if William Shakespeare himself stood at the front of a lecture theatre with a power point, his words of wisdom would only help the students who went away and tried to put his suggestions into practice. The same is true of people attending Robert McKee’s 'Story’ screenwriting seminars. Any student of creative writing will only learn how to write better, and what good writing means, if they read a lot and write a lot. In other words, via experiential learning.
Lecturers and ‘experts’
can share their own experience and talk about
tactics, and they can talk about the components of poetry
and prose – theme, plot, characterisation, style, language, genre and so on. But - in the immortal phrase
of Captain Hector Barbossa - creative writing programmes provide ‘more what you’d call “guidelines” than actual rules’.
Writing tutors don’t set out to produce homogeneous wannabes, but to
help each student learn about their field, establish a continuing working practice and find their own voice. Or at least, that’s what good
ones should do. In my opinion. And that is what the debate should be about.